The unintended consequences of a healthy eating curriculum

09-10-2023
PixelVortex
The unintended consequences of a healthy eating curriculum
Nutrition curriculum has an effect on students, but families play a major role in helping children learn about food.
Abraham Gonzalez Fernandez/iStockphoto/Getty Images
Facebook Twitter

The well-intentioned nutrition lessons taught in schools across all grade levels can have unintended consequences that harm children's eating habits and overall well-being. While these lessons aim to improve health, they unintentionally convey messages similar to those of an eating disorder, such as cutting out certain foods, limiting calorie intake, and fearing weight gain.

Ad
  • Performance-Driven Digital Marketing
  • Google Ads Campaigns
  • SEO Optimization
  • Website Design & Development
  • Social Media Management
Boost Your Business

For parents and guardians of children with eating disorders, navigating the school nutrition curriculum can be particularly difficult. Many families rightly question whether it is safe for any student to engage in these activities and may request exemptions or alternate assignments. The reality is that teachers often do not realize the potential harm that can be caused by delivering a nutrition lesson, as it can unknowingly lead vulnerable students down a dangerous path.

While not every student will be negatively impacted by these assignments, there is no way for educators to know who may be at risk. What may seem like harmless material can be explosive and catalyze an eating disorder for some children. Well-intended lessons can lead to black-and-white thinking, which in turn can lead to disordered behaviors around food, explained eating disorder therapist Zoë Bisbing.

The challenge for teachers lies in the gap between the complex, highly individual aspects of nutrition and the cognitive development of children. Nutrition, despite seeming straightforward, is actually quite complex, and children are concrete thinkers. Asking students to focus on specific nutrition details or categorize foods rarely translates to beneficial changes in their eating habits. In fact, it often takes them away from listening to their body cues and internal signals, preventing them from developing a healthy relationship with food.

Abstract categories like "sometimes foods" can be particularly challenging for children to understand. They may develop a fear of consuming too much of a "sometimes food" and conclude that they should never have it. Trying to please their teacher, some students may enter a cycle of cutting out more and more foods or feeling guilty after indulging in these "bad" foods. Others may rebel against the guidance on healthy eating by avoiding recommended items and seeking out the very foods labeled as unhealthy.

Teaching nutrition to tweens and teens presents even greater risk. Research shows that many of these young individuals already experience body dissatisfaction. Encouraging them to follow conventional healthy eating guidance as a means to lose weight can lead to an inadequate intake of essential nutrients at a time when their bodies require them most for growth and development.

Triggering an eating disorder is not the only unintended impact of nutrition lessons. The textbook portrayal of a "healthy" food is not the same for every child. Neurodivergent kids, those living in food-insecure households, and students whose cultural foods differ from the standard American diet may find school nutrition lessons unrelatable or even harmful. It can be particularly shaming and confusing for children with sensory differences who rely on certain foods to learn that their safe foods are considered unhealthy.

There are alternative approaches to addressing nutrition standards and teaching food concepts without risking harm. When covering basic nutrition facts and introducing terminology, the focus should be on neutral teaching that avoids labeling specific foods as good or bad. Similarly, educators can promote discussions about the experience of eating rather than reducing every food choice to a high-stakes health decision.

Emphasizing the joy of eating, the pleasure of sharing food with others, and the importance of learning how to prepare food as a means of connection are worthy goals for teachers to strive towards. However, it's important to remember that while classroom lessons can provide information, parents play a crucial role in shaping their child's understanding of food and nutrition. Engaging in conversations with children about what they learn in school can help explore how they relate to food and address any concerns.

Parents or guardians who have concerns about the nutrition curriculum can approach teachers with curiosity and assume positive intent. Viewing themselves as partners with the teacher is the best way to communicate and find a path forward. For children with eating disorders or special dietary needs, it may be beneficial to have proactive conversations with their teachers even before the first nutrition-related lesson. Building a partnership with the school not only supports the child but can also raise awareness among educators about the complexities and potential pitfalls of these lessons, leading to more inclusive and health-promoting curriculum adjustments.